NCFCA Logo

Volunteer as a Judge

Make a life-changing impact

Your willingness to listen, evaluate, and encourage is all we need!  Our competitors reach new levels when they get feeback from new people and new perspectives.

No experience is necessary, and you can get started with very little training. We provide the resources you need and more to explore if you choose.

Step 2 - Learn about Your Events

Spend about 30 minutes learning the basics about the process and the events you plan to judge.

Step 3 - Listen and Enjoy

Show up to listen, enjoy, and offer your feedback to students who are eager for fresh voices.

See Judging in Action

Watch this two-minute video to see what the volunteer judge experience with NCFCA will look like

Choose Your Judging Category

GET STARTED

You can select the kind of event you'd like to judge based on your schedule and preferences. We offer two styles of debate and ten speech events at most of our tournaments. If you have a legal background, we'd love to have you join us for one of our online Moot Court tournaments. No matter which event you pick, you'll find the instructions and resources you need to feel confident about the process.

    • Our competitors can choose from ten different speech events.  The options range from expository to dramatic and from fully prepared in advance to topics drawn in the competition room. Each kind of speech challenges students to learn new ways to connect with an audience.

      Learn About Judging Speech

      Preview Speech Events You Could Judge

      Speech judges can judge any of the events pictured below. for more information, visit our speech judge orientation page using the button above. 
      • Apologetics

        Presents a well-reasoned defense and thoughtful application of basic tenets of the Christian faith.

      • Extemporaneous

        Analyzes news and other sources to prepare an evidence-based speech on a current-events topic.

      • Impromptu

        Presents a unique and meaningful speech on a topic drawn from abstract words, phrases, quotations, or table topics.

      • Duo

        Explores a published literature selection and is presented by a team of two competitors.

      • Open

        Explores a published literature selection and is presented by one competitor.

      • Original

        Presents an original literary work or a derivative work.

      • Digital Presentation

        Informs or persuades the audience, accompanied by digital visual aids.

      • Informative

        Explains a significant topic.

      • Persuasive

        Influences the audience to consider a particular point of view or course of action.

      • Biblical Thematic

        Presents three or more literature selections, including one from Scripture, and visual aids to develop a biblical theme

    • Our two debate styles help students learn to support and defend ideas within the bounds of a specified value or policy topic for the season. They learn to listen well, think on their feet, and argue graciously.

      Learn About Judging Debate

      Preview the Debate Styles You Could Judge 

      • Lincoln-Douglas Value Debate

        One debater affirms the resolution while another opposes or negates it. This style of debate, named after the famous debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas, explores a philosophical clash of competing but morally defensible values.

      • Team Policy Debate

        A team of two debaters affirms the resolution while another team of two debaters negates the affirmative position. This form of debate simulates argumentation in a legislative body.

    • Moot Court simulates oral arguments before an appellate court. Students present legal arguments regarding a fictional case as they focus on convincing the judge(s) to either uphold or overturn a lower court’s ruling.

      Moot Court competition provides students with the unique opportunity to strengthen their reasoning and persuasion skills while increasing their understanding of the US Constitution and the judicial system.

      Learn About Judging Moot Court

      See an Overview of Moot Court Competition

      • Moot Court

        Moot Court simulates oral arguments before an appellate court. Students present legal arguments regarding a fictional case as they focus on convincing the judge(s) to either uphold or overturn a lower court’s ruling.

Judge Policies

We value the perspectives of caring adults from a variety of backgrounds. If you are willing and qualified, we can provide the orientation and training to help you feel equipped.

Find a Tournament
  • Judging Philosophy

    In order to offer competitors varied feedback and encourage them to be universal in their impact, NCFCA values a diverse judge pool. In addition to our parent judges, we actively recruit people from all walks of life who may or may not have judging experience. We intentionally extend judging invitations to judges with worldviews which are both similar to and different from those of NCFCA competitors.

  • Judge Eligibility Policies

    Age

    A judge must be at least 18 years old, must not be currently enrolled in high school, and must not have been eligible to compete in any NCFCA event during the current season. Please direct any questions regarding a judge’s eligibility based on age, graduation, or competition eligibility status to the National Judge Coordinator at gro.ACFCNobfsctd@segduJlanoitaN.

    Relationship

    Judges must be unrelated to the competitors they are assigned to judge and may not have coached them in that event.

    Re-Judging

    A judge should not judge a specific speaker more than one time in the same prepared speech or on the same side of a debate round in any given tournament. The same judge may judge a speaker in a different event or more than one time in limited preparation speeches.

  • Judging Conflicts

    Our ability to employ best practices for avoiding judge conflicts beyond our stated eligibility policies is dependent on the number of judges available for each round. Our system will prevent most judging conflicts, but there are some factors we ask judges to keep in mind when choosing to accept a ballot. 

    • Please do not take a ballot with a student you know very well or have coached in the event.
    • Do not take a ballot for a room where a family member is also judging. If this happens inadvertently, please contact Tournament Administration.
    • Judges who have a question or have difficulty finding a ballot that seems suitable should contact tournament administration for help.

    Parent judges should follow additional guidance contained in our tournament prep instructions.

  • Judge Decisions

    All judge decisions are final as they apply to assessment of the round; however, adjudication determinations by the National Adjudication Team supersede judge assessments. All adjudication decisions are final.

  • Ballot Completion and Deadlines

    At the end of the round, please exit the competition room to finish filling out your ballot. For in-person tournaments, please remain at the facility until your ballot is complete.

    You will receive a notification indicating the time when ballots are due. We want judges to provide ample and excellent feedback; however, for the tournament to proceed in a timely manner, the ballot deadline must also be honored. Until we have all ballots returned, we cannot begin processing the next round. Therefore, please prioritize essential items on your ballot like your win/loss decision for debate and ranking speakers for both speech and debate, then provide as much additional feedback as time allows.

Voices from the Stage

testimonials

Hear firsthand from NCFCA competitors about how much your contribution of time means to them.

  • Judges are vital to our mission!

    We have both parent and community judges; I think they're so incredibly vital because we have to be able to appeal to all audiences.

  • Different Judge Viewpoints Drive Growth

    I would not be the speaker and the person, ultimately, I am today without ballots from judges. The different walks of life and different views that people have when they put things on your ballot is just phenomenal for building you as a person and for building your repertoire, to be able to be going out in the world and impacting for God.

  • Judges get to learn new things!

    I learn things at every tournament. You know, there's a speech about something I haven't ever really studied, and it is always fascinating. I come away with new ideas and new topics on my mind. It helps me grow as a person, as a thinker, as an individual.

  • Judges, you will be inspired!

    It's inspiring for judges. When they come in, they see the future of our country, and they're just so impressed with these kids in the rounds that they've had. It's just truly inspiring.

  • Community Judge feedback is incredibly valuable!

    The feedback that you get is so incredibly valuable. You get that outsider opinion, that outsider perspective as well. The community judges are just absolutely wonderful, and they're some of my favorite ones to get feedback from.

FAQs

Find answers to commonly asked questions about competing in tournaments.
  • Do I need prior experience to judge an NCFCA tournament?

    As an NCFCA judge, you don’t need prior judging experience. NCFCA provides comprehensive training and resources to equip you with the knowledge and skills necessary to evaluate student performances effectively.

    The organization believes that a passion for communication and a willingness to learn are the most important qualities for a successful judge.