Debate Judge Information

Welcome & Thank You!

Our competitors are working on learning to talk about big ideas in ways that anyone can understand. They value feedback from judges who are not experienced with debate and bring a fresh, real-world view to each round.

  • Learn the Basics

    See what to expect from debate rounds and how to approach the judging process. In the following tabs you will also have the option to learn more about the style of debate you plan to judge. 

    Need help with Registration?

  • Required Child Safety Video

    All adults who participate in our tournaments are required to view our 4-minute Judge Welcome and Safety video and agree to our Child Safety Protocols before interacting with the minors who compete in our tournaments. 

    Thank you for taking time to help us ensure the safety of students in our program. 

    • If you know which style of debate you plan to judge, we invite you to advance to our Value or Policy debate orientation videos and resources. 

     

  • Lincoln-Douglas Value Debate

    Value debate rounds feature one competitor on each side of the resolution and last about 45 minutes.

    This year’s resolution is: In combat, the use of automation should be valued above the use of military personnel. 

    Optional Resources

  • Team Policy Debate

    Policy debate rounds feature two competitors on each team and last about 75 minutes. 

    This year’s resolution is: The United States Federal Government should significantly reform its foreign policy toward one or more of the following Central American countries: Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica.

    Optional Resources

Preview Debate Events You Could Judge

Debate judges can choose any of the events pictured below.
  • Lincoln-Douglas Value Debate

    One debater affirms the resolution while another opposes or negates it. This style of debate, named after the famous debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas, explores a philosophical clash of competing but morally defensible values.

  • Team Policy Debate

    A team of two debaters affirms the resolution while another team of two debaters negates the affirmative position. This form of debate simulates argumentation in a legislative body.

Judge Policies

We value the perspectives of caring adults form a variety of backgrounds. If you are willing and qualified, we can provide the orientation and training to help you feel equipped.

Find a Tournament
  • Judging Philosophy

    In order to offer competitors varied feedback and encourage them to be universal in their impact, NCFCA values a diverse judge pool. In addition to our parent judges, we actively recruit people from all walks of life who may or may not have judging experience. We intentionally extend judging invitations to judges with worldviews which are both similar to and different from those of NCFCA competitors.

  • Judge Eligibility Policies

    Age

    A judge must be at least 18 years old, must not be currently enrolled in high school, and must not have been eligible to compete in any NCFCA event during the current season. Please direct any questions regarding a judge’s eligibility based on age, graduation, or competition eligibility status to the National Judge Coordinator at gro.ACFCNobfsctd@segduJlanoitaN.

    Relationship

    Judges must be unrelated to the competitors they are assigned to judge and may not have coached them in that event.

    Re-Judging

    A judge should not judge a specific speaker more than one time in the same prepared speech or on the same side of a debate round in any given tournament. The same judge may judge a speaker in a different event or more than one time in limited preparation speeches.

  • Judging Conflicts

    Our ability to employ best practices for avoiding judge conflicts beyond our stated eligibility policies is dependent on the number of judges available for each round. Our system will prevent most judging conflicts, but there are some factors we ask judges to keep in mind when choosing to accept a ballot. 

    • Please do not take a ballot with a student you know very well or have coached in the event.
    • Do not take a ballot for a room where a family member is also judging. If this happens inadvertently, please contact Tournament Administration.
    • Judges who have a question or have difficulty finding a ballot that seems suitable should contact tournament administration for help.

    Parent judges should follow additional guidance contained in our tournament prep instructions.

  • Judge Decisions

    All judge decisions are final as they apply to assessment of the round; however, adjudication determinations by the National Adjudication Team supersede judge assessments. All adjudication decisions are final.

  • Ballot Completion and Deadlines

    At the end of the round, please exit the competition room to finish filling out your ballot. For in-person tournaments, please remain at the facility until your ballot is complete.

    You will receive a notification indicating the time when ballots are due. We want judges to provide ample and excellent feedback; however, for the tournament to proceed in a timely manner, the ballot deadline must also be honored. Until we have all ballots returned, we cannot begin processing the next round. Therefore, please prioritize essential items on your ballot like your win/loss decision for debate and ranking speakers for both speech and debate, then provide as much additional feedback as time allows.